Information detailing the efficiency of a business is vital to determine not only the efficacy of the company, but to pinpoint areas that need improvement, or that simply are not working. A couple of terms that get tossed around when it comes to performance reporting are metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPI). There is a level of confusion about these two measurements, primarily concerned with the differences between the two, and which would be the ideal tool to use. To understand when to use metrics and when to use KPIs, it would be best first to take a deeper look at the two.
Metrics
The problem with the openhanded nature of metrics is that not all are inherently useful, and it is easy to fall into the trap of measuring things for the sake of measuring them and wasting time not only in the measuring but in trying to improve efficiency where it isn’t needed. Using the right metrics is where KPIs come in.
Key Performance Indicators
KPIs should help put the information they provide in context. While the number of unique visits to a company’s website is interesting information, a KPI that measures the ad Click Through Ratio is actually useful and provides context for the raw visit numbers. For a brick and mortar store, a KPI that measures the number of customer interactions with customer service is helpful, but a KPI that quantifies those interactions into categories such as product returns, questions, and complaints will provide context and help drive process improvements.
One way to help clarify the distinction between metrics and KPIs is to remember that while all KPIs are metrics, not all metrics are KPIs. KPIs are targeted metrics that provide useful information that puts the raw data into context to help drive positive business change.